I said I would provide evidence about the Syrian opposition and it’s friends in high places. Well, it’s not my research that exposes the anti-Assad groups, it’s Charlie Skelton, in a piece he wrote a couple of years ago. This is well worth reading and clarifies the devious tactics the so called Syrian opposition uses and who is really pulling all the strings.
This is an unconfirmed story from Reuters and thus far has absolutely no credibility, all the same the BBC decide to give it publicity as if it is verified. If Iraqi pilots have defected to ISIS, why would they need to train others? More to the point, where were the Iraqi pilots when ISIS waltzed into Iraq unopposed?
Rami Abdul Rahman, head of the SOHR, said IS was using Iraqi officers who were pilots under ex-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to train fighters in Syria.
Rami Abdul Rahman is a fierce critic of Assad and approves of military intervention to bring about his removal. The SOHR is not independent and cannot be trusted. Just the same as the several think tanks in UK and US who fund these anti Assad groups. The finances ultimately come from the two respective governments. This is a proven fact, not speculation.
Rahman and numerous others purporting to be the official opposition have been trying to get the West to remove Assad for years with their bogus claims. It’s Western government job to highlight the stories they produce to convince Westerners to believe and approve of intervention. The poison gas fraud was one of their productions. I’ll be producing evidence of these charlatans’ lies in the near future.
In my opinion, prosecution evidence and statements used in terrorist cases in the UK tend to be as sensationalist and unbelievable as any conspiracy theorist could concoct. The latest one involves a character called Erol Incedal. Mr Incedal is accused of various terrorism offences, seemingly from bugged conversations he had with his accomplices. It’s extremely debatable whether these types of conversations can be used as evidence considering the lively imaginations of humans. Everyone has encountered the kind of people I’m referring to, the man (or woman) who has done it all or about to do it. Anything you mention, they’ve already been there or they are about to do it. They can be described as dreamers or fantasisers, out of touch with reality and living in their own little perfect world in which they are able to do anything. Besides being slightly irritating at times, they are a danger only to themselves and trying to prove that they are a danger to wider society doesn’t convince me. Code words being used but not understood by other members of the group reveals the incompetence of these accused terrorists.
Worse than that are the claims of the prosecution lawyers who clearly have similar lively imaginations. The recent case has revealed that the group of men were trying to buy a gun. It’s illegal in the UK to have a gun unless you are explicitly authorised to posses one, such as a Police marksman. I could argue that most enforcement officers aren’t fit to have one but that is a different matter. So, these alleged terrorists are recorded discussing a gun and some bullets and if that’s the case , they should be found guilty of conspiring to obtain an illegal weapon. However, having virtually proving this to be the case the prosecution then go in to exaggeration mode. They claim that this one gun (if proven beyond reasonable doubt) could be part of a conspiracy to create an attack in the UK similar to the Mumbai attacks from a few years ago when 170 people were murdered. Mentioning Mumbai in respect of this court case is nothing short of pure fantasy and when such comparisons are used I have to question what real evidence they do have.
By turning the purchase of a gun from some low level career criminal into an arms shipment comparable to the huge amount of weapons required to commit the Mumbai atrocity reveals that this should be a prosecution of someone attempting to buy an illegal weapon, not a secretly held court case that supports a government agenda.
The murder of Mr Henning is as predictable as it was pointless. The cranks that have departed from the UK and other (mainly) European countries to join ISIS can only be described as gullible dreamers who were going to be led astray by one thing or another, it was just a matter of time. People like that aren’t in endless supply thankfully, so once ISIS have managed to tempt the initial ‘groupies’ to magically appear in Syria and Iraq, they will struggle to brainwash increasing numbers because friends and relatives of the vulnerable will be on alert. Obviously, killing a seemingly kind and decent man like Alan Henning isn’t going to get the average Muslim to join their ranks. The vast majority of Muslims just want to live their life in accordance with their religion and be successful in life, the same as everyone else. ISIS’ appeal has already peaked. Alan Henning’s death will be almost universally condemned amongst Muslims. If ever there was a major publicity blunder, this is it. If ISIS’ aim was to become despised amongst it’s potential friends, this was the way to do it. This murder has printed a very large target on anyone connected to this gang of cold hearted killers ….But what would be the point in that? There is none. No matter which way you look at it, it’s illogical. It served no purpose at all, neither as a recruiting ploy and certainly not to win any friends. I thought that was the intention of groups or cults…To harvest more followers? These clowns are a fabrication from the top to bottom. Strike terror in to hearts? Give me a break, they are only brave when it comes to fighting people who can’t fight back.
There are some very odd things about the British hostages of ISIS. Henning had been in the country less than an hour before he was abducted and by all accounts, the group he was with had made numerous visits to Syria with aid from the UK. This means that at least some of them would have a reasonable idea about where they should and should not go. If that’s what they did and he was still abducted, he was set up. Either by one of his comrades or a group who would know they had just arrived, so would therefore know the flight they were going to be on and other details. I doubt ISIS have access to flight schedules and passenger lists.
People who have ignored the religious differences and gone to Muslim countries to try to help in difficult situations have usually been met with hospitality that is second to none. For instance in Gaza, where they have barely enough food and drink to survive on there are many stories of these people sharing their meagre supplies with total strangers. ISIS is about as far away from genuine Islam and the instinctive generosity of Muslims as you could get. It’s a scam, a fraud, a great big fat lie.
There could be many different reasons for the creation of ISIS. It might purely be to continue bombing Muslim countries to feed the weapons manufacturers and the ‘security’ industry. It could be Israel agitating and encouraging the Yinon plan which involves creating chaos in neighbour countries to keep them weak and fragmented so that they aren’t a threat. Netanyahu only recently tried to tar Hamas with the ISIS brush in his speech at the UN. If you want a good laugh, it’s worth watching. The man is a third rate actor (maybe all politicians are) and his efforts to associate Hamas and ISIS would be comical if so many people didn’t actually believe him. Hamas can only barely try to defend their tiny enclave in Gaza, never mind conquer vast areas of the Middle East.
John Cantrie is totally different to Mr Henning. He’s been kidnapped before and then returned so we would have to say he was much more aware of the dangers than Alan. It appears his departure back to Syria also destroyed the prosecution of two British men who were accused of kidnapping him whilst he was previously in Syria. There doesn’t seem to be much information about why the terrorism case was dropped although we could conclude it was probably because Cantlie had already returned to the Middle East. If this is true, he was not only reckless about his own life but showed scant regard for anyone else’s by allowing two very dangerous criminals off the hook.
It was a very strange decision to return after such a close brush with death.
Anthony Charles Lynton Blair has recently been adding his voice to the loud chorus of ‘boots on the ground’ chants. He would though, wouldn’t he? I’ve no doubt he invests heavily in weapons manufacturers and war industry connected companies. If he feels that strongly about it, he should be the boots on the ground he talks of… Leading his talentless, sponging kids and ugly wife (who will no doubt scare the living daylights out of ISIS).
This isn’t the first time John Cantlie has been kidnapped in Syria. He was previously freed from captivity by unknown forces. Two British doctors were charged in connection with his kidnapping but it seems Cantlie never presented himself in court as a prosecution witness. The prosecution said ‘a problem arose’.
Today, Theresa May claimed we could be the target of a nuclear terror atrocity. These warnings doen’t appear to be backed up by Police and other security agencies. A main prosecution witness was unavailable to give evidence in a very serious terrorism trial and then the Conservative Party try to instil us with fear about ‘terrorism’. Allowing Shajul Islam and Najul Islam to have their cases dropped (partially because of John Cantlie) does not imply terrorism is such a grave danger, after all, the case was dropped without a fuss from the British Government.
Cantlie was described as a photographer then. Now he is described as a journalist. His presentations for ISIS don’t seem natural, the speeches themselves are very well written.
Ultimately, anyone who would return to such a hostile environment a second time doesn’t value his life very much.
Another thought. If, as the British Government suspect, the two doctor brother’s previously charged with Cantlie’s kidnapping were responsible, why haven’t they been rearrested for questioning?
Unless we consider the latest terrorist movement to be incredibly stupid, dropping bombs on them will not be easy. Publicity and political manoeuvring means that the terrorists are aware that the state terrorists are in pursuit. This will be a somewhat muted pursuit and I don’t think ISIS need worry too much. I believe there are two strategies that will become more obvious in the near future. The first is to stop the favoured Kurdish regions from being attacked and conquered (there are no strict general rules, some Kurds are favoured more than others). The second is to make it blatantly obvious that it is unsafe for all ISIS newly acquired tanks and heavy weaponry (courtesy of US tax payers via Iraqi forces) to remain in Eastern Syria. At this point, the border with Iraq will be monitored and any ISIS trying to go back there will be deleted (they’ve done their job in Iraq already).
The escape route through Turkey is only allowed if it is discrete, no heavy weaponry nor troop carriers and tanks. That leaves only one direction in which to move and that is towards Assad controlled regions in the West. Obama and Cameron have had enough of the pressure from Netanyahu now, they have to pay back for their respective election wins. The Israeli’s think the time is right now that they’ve kept the people of Gaza occupied with other problems (specifically, trying to put a roof over their heads). They can keep their eye on the game of ‘remove Assad’ and of course continue to patch up ISIS and Al Nusra terrorists in their hospitals.
A brief look at recent history tells us that the alternatives to dictators are not always that good. The Iraqi people have been murdered and traumatised and their lives are generally much worse than under Saddam. Likewise the Libyans. In fact everywhere ‘we’ve’ been trying to remove evil or protect the innocent we seemed to have messed it up. On a personal basis, I have the irritating habit of not learning from my mistakes, however, I don’t have the time or resources that Cameron and Obama have. I don’t have the advisor’s, think tanks, special committees and so on. I don’t have any significant qualifications from my school years, no diplomas or doctorates. On that basis, I can understand my own repeated mistakes and have given up on trying to change.
So, why are these well educated World leaders making mistakes that are well documented and proven to be disastrous? It’s obvious, it has to be deliberate. There is no other explanation. That so many politicians can get it so wrong on a repeated basis doesn’t stink of incompetence or stupidity. It’s deliberate and until we, the average person, identifies this ridiculous ‘the Emperor has new clothes’ fantasy, we are doomed to a miserable future indeed. Worse than that, you are condemning your children and grandchildren to a future without hope. By the time the futuristic images of complete government control start to resonate with people, it will be too late. It wouldn’t irritate me so much if the people that imprison us had been inventive, articulate and extremely intelligent but they weren’t. They just kept repeating the same old shit and the majority of us believed them, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
Of course they should. It’s all right for Obama to spin his web of lies and demand high standards and behaviour within the law from other nations if he maintained such a moral code himself. He doesn’t. He does basically what he wants and sticks two fingers up to the legal process that should be adhered to. The British Empire did nothing for the average citizen of the UK, just as it does nothing for the average American. The Empires plunder tax payments from we, the tax payers and direct it into already wealthy pockets by dropping bombs to obliterate (generally) none white people. The principle of conquest is the same, the main difference is the creation of enemies to allow Obama, Cameron and company to keep doing it. The (clearly) staged and censored beheading of Westerners is not good enough. Only security forces or a treacherous colleague could have resulted in Alan Henning being kidnapped so soon in Syria. This in itself throws up a number of awkward questions for the authorities. The aid workers that were with Mr Henning hadn’t been watched closely enough or our own security services tipped off the kidnappers.It’s not quite as ridiculous as it sounds.
To keep dropping bombs on civilians in far away countries, they need a reason. Commendably, few people were fooled by the bogus Assad chemical weapons claims. Furthermore, given open access to the videos, most people would quickly realise just how badly made they are. However, shortly after release of the footage, it was claimed on the BBC that it might well be illegal to even view the videos. The real crazies pretending to be Islamic don’t do censorship. They thrive on people being disgusted and even fearful. That is exactly what they were designed and created for.